Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
J Glaucoma ; 30(5): e259-e261, 2021 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33675339

RESUMO

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is commonly treated with amphetamines as first line therapy. Rare case reports have shown amphetamines are associated with open angle glaucoma. We report a rare case of a 14-year-old male who presented with bilateral acute angle closure presumed to be related to his use of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (Vyvanse). The patient's medication was discontinued which resulted in complete resolution of angle closure.


Assuntos
Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto , Adolescente , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/efeitos adversos , Criança , Dextroanfetamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Dimesilato de Lisdexanfetamina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Glaucoma ; 30(3): e47-e49, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33273280

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted ophthalmology practices significantly. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Center for Disease Control guidelines suggest mandatory masking of patients and physicians during outpatient visits. We have recently become aware of a mask-induced phenomenon, whereby the intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is artificially elevated due to mechanical interference from the mask. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old male with a history of primary open-angle glaucoma on triple therapy presented for a routine visit. CLINICAL FINDINGS: When measuring IOP by GAT the right eye measured 16 mm Hg, but the left eye measured 20 mm Hg. The patient's mask was noted to be touching the base of the sensor rod on the tonometer. This patient's IOP was falsely elevated due to the lateral edge of his mask touching the base of the applanation tonometer, changing the relationship between the bi-prism tip and the weighted balance below, and eliminating the weighted balance from the pressure measuring mechanism. The patient's mask was adjusted to ensure there was no touch and repeat measurement showed an IOP of 16 mm Hg in the left eye. CONCLUSION: Recognizing mask-induced alteration in IOP is essential as it could lead to unnecessary escalation of treatment. We recommend flattening the area of mask protrusion during applanation and ensuring that the sensor arm remains clear of the mask while the tonometer tip approaches the cornea, especially at the moment the mires become visible during corneal contact.


Assuntos
Artefatos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/fisiopatologia , Pressão Intraocular/fisiologia , Máscaras , Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , Tonometria Ocular/métodos , Adulto , COVID-19/terapia , Comorbidade , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/diagnóstico , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...